In Search of Mrs Manning

by Fr Nicholas Schofield It is always fascinating looking at old census records. It is as if the past is frozen in time. The details of every man, woman and child living in the UK on a particular day were carefully recorded each decade. If they…

Time to Read:

5โ€“8 minutes

by Fr Nicholas Schofield

It is always fascinating looking at old census records. It is as if the past is frozen in time. The details of every man, woman and child living in the UK on a particular day were carefully recorded each decade. If they were away from home they were registered at the address where they were found by the census officials.

The other day I was looking at the 1891 census records for Cardinal Manning. His entry appears among the list of residents of Carlisle Mansions, just round the corner from the present-day Archbishopโ€™s House, although the census taker made a point of calling number 282 โ€˜Cardinal Manningโ€™s Palaceโ€™. It provides a snapshot of his household on 5th April 1891, Easter Saturday.

Visiting the cardinal that day were his eventual successor, Bishop Herbert Vaughan, and his brother Kenelm, also a Catholic priest. It is interesting to see the names of Manningโ€™s household: his secretary William Johnson, who later became an Auxiliary Bishop in Westminster, and his โ€˜butlerโ€™ and โ€˜domestic servantโ€™, William Newman. His presence in Manningโ€™s home led to a malicious rumour that โ€˜he had been chosen for this name of his because Manning liked to order about a person called Newman โ€“ but,โ€™ added Manningโ€™s friend, J. E. C. Bodley, โ€˜this was pure legend.โ€™ Then there were the rest of the domestic staff, now long forgotten but essential to this eminent Victorianโ€™s well-being: James Coombs, the butlerโ€™s assistant; Catherine Harnett, โ€˜cook and housekeeperโ€™, and (presumably) her daughter, also called Catherine, who was the โ€˜kitchen maidโ€™; and finally Margaret Crankan, โ€˜house maidโ€™.

There is one detail that stands out, however. The occupation of 82 year-old Henry Edward Manning is given, as one might expect, as โ€˜Cardinal Archbishopโ€™ but his โ€˜condition as to marriageโ€™ is that of a โ€˜widowerโ€™.

In actual fact, Manning was one of two 19th century English cardinals who had formerly been married. The first was Cardinal Thomas Weld, from a well-known English Catholic family who in 1796 married Lucy Clifford, by whom he had a daughter, Mary Lucy. His wife died in 1815 and three years later his daughter married, allowing him to prepare for ordination. When he was eventually made a cardinal his daughter watched the consistory from behind a curtain and he attracted much attention in Rome by riding in his carriage with his assembled grandchildren. He was known as the โ€˜Cardinal of the Seven Sacramentsโ€™.

Henry Edward Manning, on the other hand, was born in Totteridge, Hertfordshire in 1808 and studied at Harrow and Oxford. His father was a wealthy West Indian sugar merchant but when the family business collapsed the young Manning experienced something of a conversion and prepared himself for Holy Orders in the Church of England. He was ordained in 1832 and took up a seemingly obscure curacy at Lavington and Graffham, near Chichester in Sussex.

Shortly afterwards the Rector, Rev John Sargent, died and Manning succeeded him. The late Rector had seven children, including five daughters. According to George Dudley Ryder, who married the youngest of them, โ€˜the beauty of those sisters was of no ordinary kindโ€™. Thomas Mozley met them at a breakfast party in 1829. He noted that they had a โ€˜peach bloomโ€™ on their cheeks, which added to their beauty. It also acted as a harbinger of tragedy, for the Sargents had a weak constitution, with a tubercular strain, and only one of the seven siblings outlived their mother.

The young Manning married Caroline Sargent on 7th November 1833 after a three-month courtship. The ceremony was performed by the brideโ€™s brother-in-law, Samuel Wilberforce, later bishop first of Oxford and then Winchester. Carolineโ€™s family would later prove influential in her husbandโ€™s conversion to Rome: two sisters-in-law would eventually be received into the Church with their husbands and children, and a nephew, Fr Ignatius Ryder, succeeded Newman as Provost of the Birmingham Oratory.

The couple seems to have been generally happy. Some claim that Manning proposed marriage by telling the young lady, โ€˜Caroline, I have spoken to your motherโ€™; and it is difficult to imagine even young Mr Manning on his knees before Caroline.โ€™ There are hints that Caroline had some initial reservations about the marriage. On honeymoon, Manning wrote to Mrs Sargent that his bride was now โ€˜more like herselfโ€™ and โ€˜it really seems as if a weight of uncertainty and depression had been removedโ€™.

The newly-married Manning threw himself into prayer, study and parish work. Unusually for the times, he took his pastoral responsibilities seriously, introducing the daily round of morning and evening prayer and tolling the bell himself to call his flock to church. He tried to visit his parishioners regularly, many of whom were Downland shepherds, and became a familiar and stately figure trudging the country lanes.

In 1837, the same year that the widower Cardinal Weld died, Caroline fell ill. She died of consumption on 24th July, aged only 25, leaving her husband a childless widower. On her deathbed, she told her mother, โ€˜look after Henryโ€™, and this she did for a number of years, keeping house for him and acting as a companion.

In his book Eminent Victorians, Lytton Strachey claimed that โ€˜in after years, the memory of his wife seemed to be blotted from his mindโ€™ and that he saw her death as opening up his career possibilities, numbering it among โ€˜Godโ€™s special merciesโ€™. In reality, nothing could have been further from the truth. Manning was clearly heart-broken and spent many hours beside his wifeโ€™s grave, where he would often compose his sermons. He wrote to Newman, โ€˜I try to leave all in Godโ€™s hands โ€“ but it is very, very difficult โ€ฆ No man knows what it is to watch the desire of his eyes fading away.โ€™ He confessed to Samuel Wilberforce that he felt โ€˜the absolute need of full employment, and to the best of my powers I maintain a habit of fixed attention, and suffer as few intervals of disengaged time as I can.โ€™ If he seldom spoke of Caroline in subsequent years, it may be that he found it too painful.

He later erected a stained glass window in Chichester Cathedral in her memory and treasured all her letters. These were stolen while travelling to Rome in 1851. One of his companions remembered that โ€˜at the first moment after the discovery of his loss the expression of grief in his face and voice was such as I have seldom witnessed. He spoke little; and when I was beginning to speak, he laid his hand upon my arm, and said, โ€™Say nothing! I can just endure it when I keep perfectly silent.โ€™ He gradually learnt to accept the loss, reflecting that โ€˜the loss was probably necessary โ€“ necessary to sever all bonds to earthโ€™ as he began a new chapter in his life as a Catholic priest.

Caroline would not be forgotten. Years later, a flower from her grave would each year be taken to the aged Cardinal in Westminster, who regarded it with great emotion. As he lay dying in 1892, he entrusted a volume of his wifeโ€™s prayers and reflections to Herbert Vaughan, saying: โ€˜not a day has passed since her death on which I have not prayed and meditated from that book. All the good I may have done, all the good I may have been, I owe to her.โ€™ The precious volume was kept under his pillow and presumably buried with him.

It is an astonishing thought. Carolineโ€™s grave at Lavington is now in a rather poor state, covered in lichen and difficult to read, but her personal book of prayers lies with her beloved in the magnificence of the crypt of Westminster Cathedral.

This article originally appeared in the Catholic Times on 9th March. It is reprinted by kind permission of the Catholic Times.

Tags:

MOST VIEWED


More News